Giants eating giants
It wasn’t that long ago since the largest publishers were collectively referred to as the Big 6.
In 2013, however, the two largest companies in that pack merged to form Penguin Random House – a perfect example of how to merge two really strong brand-names into a nonsensical hodgepodge.
The same is happening again now. PRH – by far the largest trade publisher – is wanting to eat up Simon & Schuster, the smallest of the Big 5. The US Department of Justice promptly launched an anti-trust lawsuit aimed at blocking the merger.
It’s easy for an author to feel like the flattened little guy in all this. Big companies merge. The fewer companies around, the fewer buyers have for their books. The less the competition, the lower the advances. Authors lose, right?
Only the case is a nonsense, and it’s useful and comforting to remember why not.
Self-publishing
Ten years ago, self-pub wasn’t really a thing. Now it certainly is. These days, there’s no longer any good public data for the scale of the self-pub market, but very roughly you should assume that self-published titles sell as many copies as all Big 5 titles on Amazon combined – in other words, one heck of a lot. Indeed, there are corners of the reading globe (romance and erotica especially) where self-publishing utterly dominates.
What’s more, indie authors make money. Again, public data is no longer available, but when it was, it was clear that at every single income level you care to name, there were more indie authors earning at that level than trad-published ones. More million-dollar indies. More $100K indies. And so on down. I’m certain that that basic picture hasn’t changed.
Multiple imprints
A friend of mine is currently selling a book, via a top British agent at a top British agency. The list of editors who are receiving that book include (of course) all the Big 5. It may surprise you to learn that the book doesn’t go to just one editor per publisher. It goes to as many editors, at as many imprints, as may be right for the book. From memory, the book is therefore going to two editors in different bits of HarperCollins, the same at PRH, and so on.
If an auction arises, those two HarperCollins editors, let’s say, might find themselves bidding against each other. A PRH / S&S merger wouldn’t necessarily reduce the number of editors that an agent pitched to. It would just change the email addresses of one recipient.
The long tail
Good publishing simply does not stop at the big firms.
My friend had as many small- to mid-sized publishers on that submissions list as Big 5 editors. And honestly? I think it’s simply 50/50 whether the book ends with a large house or a small one. The right publisher for that book will be one where the editorial, design and marketing visions align the best … along with a dollop of good chemistry between author and editor. A real passion from a Faber or a Bloomsbury or a Granta would (to my mind) be a better deal than a more lukewarm offer from a larger firm. (Those are British firms, but there are similar firms in the US and elsewhere too.)
The quality in some of these smaller houses is incredible. You often get more daring publishing, greater willingness to take risks, and generally bolder decisions at every level of the firm. You also, as an author, actually feel important to the firm, which is not something that’s easy to feel when you’re in the grip of one of the big machines. I once rejected an offer from a top, top quality British independent and I’ve always wonder if I did the right thing. If I had to guess, I’d say probably not.
Money
The Department of Justice suit against the PRH / S&S merger may possibly be one of the strangest anti-trust lawsuits ever conducted.
The suit does not argue that consumers will be hurt by higher prices. (That won’t happen.)
It doesn’t argue that consumer choice will be limited. (It won’t be.)
It doesn’t argue that most authors will suffer. (They won’t.)
It goes to extreme and bizarre lengths to argue that self-published books live in some wholly different realm from the trad-published ones. (Which is just dumb. Books are books. It’s not like readers even notice or care.)
So why is this merger supposedly such a terrible idea? Answer: because authors of books expecting a more than $250,000 advance may be negatively impacted.
Huh? That’s worth a lawsuit? Because of a possible – and highly theoretical – impact on a tiny handful of superstar authors?
It’s madness.
Sanity
So perhaps now is a good moment to point out that:
- Advances aren’t everything. There are film rights and foreign sales and speaking fees and lord knows what else.
- Advances are advances against royalties. Highly successful books will always make money for their authors.
- Advances are not a metric of marketing zeal or marketing intelligence. A smaller advance from a brilliant publisher may do more for the author than a larger one from a less impassioned house.
- Most authors I know don’t ultimately care about money anyway. Yes, they want to be paid properly for their work, and they want that side of things to be handled with proper justice and professionalism, but the real payoff is more intangible. It’s the passion of a publisher, the respect of a community of peers, the book in the bookshop, the reviews and comments. All those things are every bit as likely – perhaps likelier – for authors working with strong indie presses as for those working with the Big 5.
The simple fact is that it’s better to be an author today than at any point in the last two decades. Indeed, that’s probably underselling it. I think it’s easy to argue that this is the best ever time to be an author.
The Big 5 firms are great. The indie publishers are better than they’ve ever been. Self-publishing creates a tremendously inspiring and effective route for countless authors.
Author-led marketing tools are the best they’ve ever been.
Barnes & Noble and Waterstones (respectively the flagship bookchains in the US and UK) are both in better shape than ever.
The independent bookstore sector has lost a lot of poor-quality stores, but the strong ones remain strong.
Books (thanks, especially to low cost ebook pricing) are insanely affordable – and you can read in any format you choose much more easily than before.
Oh yes, and Jericho Writers is here, to make your journey to publication sweeter, better informed and more companionable than it’s ever been.
Be happy. Life is good.
Whilst the whole anti-trust suit has been, well, interesting, the bottom line, as you say, seems to be that business as usual. Quality work will sell if the market is there and it hits the right agent, then the right editor/publishers at the right time. We as writers need to hone and polish away irrespective. Have a nice week! Me, I’m off to instruct a solicitor about a possible loss of literary earnings ranging in the millions . . . 🙂
This is so inspiring and encouraging, Harry! You’ve shown that something that – at face value – might be bad for writers is actually going to be fine. Some of the indies you mention – Faber, Bloomsbury, Granta – are of such high quality and produce such terrific books that sell in big numbers and win big prizes, that they are big-hitters themselves. And that summing up, the fact that there’s never been a better time to be a writer – I feel positively bouyant now! Bouncing off for a weekend of trying to write, despite the heat.