It wasn\u2019t that long ago since the largest publishers were collectively referred to as the Big 6.<\/p>\n
In 2013, however, the two largest companies in that pack merged to form Penguin Random House \u2013 a perfect example of how to merge two really strong brand-names into a nonsensical hodgepodge.<\/p>\n
The same is happening again now. PRH \u2013 by far the largest trade publisher \u2013 is wanting to eat up Simon & Schuster, the smallest of the Big 5. The US Department of Justice promptly launched an anti-trust lawsuit aimed at blocking the merger. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
It\u2019s easy for an author to feel like the flattened little guy in all this. Big companies merge. The fewer companies around, the fewer buyers have for their books. The less the competition, the lower the advances. Authors lose, right?<\/p>\n
Only the case is a nonsense, and it\u2019s useful and comforting to remember why not.<\/p>\n
Self-publishing<\/strong><\/p>\n Ten years ago, self-pub wasn\u2019t really a thing. Now it certainly is. These days, there\u2019s no longer any good public data for the scale of the self-pub market, but very roughly you should assume that self-published titles sell as many copies as all Big 5 titles on Amazon combined \u2013 in other words, one heck of a lot. Indeed, there are corners of the reading globe (romance and erotica especially) where self-publishing utterly dominates.<\/p>\n What\u2019s more, indie authors make money. Again, public data is no longer available, but when it was, it was clear that at every single income level you care to name, there were more indie authors earning at that level than trad-published ones. More million-dollar indies. More $100K indies. And so on down. I\u2019m certain that that basic picture hasn\u2019t changed.<\/p>\n Multiple imprints<\/strong><\/p>\n A friend of mine is currently selling a book, via a top British agent at a top British agency. The list of editors who are receiving that book include (of course) all the Big 5. It may surprise you to learn that the book doesn\u2019t go to just one editor per publisher. It goes to as many editors, at as many imprints, as may be right for the book. From memory, the book is therefore going to two editors in different bits of HarperCollins, the same at PRH, and so on.<\/p>\n If an auction arises, those two HarperCollins editors, let\u2019s say, might find themselves bidding against each other. A PRH \/ S&S merger wouldn\u2019t necessarily reduce the number of editors that an agent pitched to. It would just change the email addresses of one recipient.<\/p>\n The long tail<\/strong><\/p>\n Good publishing simply does not stop at the big firms.<\/p>\n My friend had as many small- to mid-sized publishers on that submissions list as Big 5 editors. And honestly? I think it\u2019s simply 50\/50 whether the book ends with a large house or a small one. The right publisher for that book will be one where the editorial, design and marketing visions align the best \u2026 along with a dollop of good chemistry between author and editor. A real passion from a Faber or a Bloomsbury or a Granta would (to my mind) be a better deal than a more lukewarm offer from a larger firm. (Those are British firms, but there are similar firms in the US and elsewhere too.)<\/p>\n The quality in some of these smaller houses is incredible. You often get more daring publishing, greater willingness to take risks, and generally bolder decisions at every level of the firm. You also, as an author, actually feel important to the firm, which is not something that\u2019s easy to feel when you\u2019re in the grip of one of the big machines. I once rejected an offer from a top, top quality British independent and I\u2019ve always wonder if I did the right thing. If I had to guess, I\u2019d say probably not.<\/p>\n Money<\/strong><\/p>\n The Department of Justice suit against the PRH \/ S&S merger may possibly be one of the strangest anti-trust lawsuits ever conducted.<\/p>\n The suit does not argue that consumers will be hurt by higher prices. (That won\u2019t happen.)<\/p>\n It doesn\u2019t argue that consumer choice will be limited. (It won\u2019t be.)\u00a0<\/p>\n It doesn\u2019t argue that most authors will suffer. (They won\u2019t.)<\/p>\n It goes to extreme and bizarre lengths to argue that self-published books live in some wholly different realm from the trad-published ones. (Which is just dumb. Books are books. It\u2019s not like readers even notice or care.)<\/p>\n So why is this merger supposedly such a terrible idea? Answer: because authors of books expecting a more than $250,000 advance may be negatively impacted.<\/p>\n Huh? That\u2019s worth a lawsuit? Because of a possible \u2013 and highly theoretical \u2013 impact on a tiny handful of superstar authors?<\/p>\n It\u2019s madness.<\/p>\n Sanity<\/strong><\/p>\n So perhaps now is a good moment to point out that:<\/p>\n The simple fact is that it\u2019s better to be an author today than at any point in the last two decades. Indeed, that\u2019s probably underselling it. I think it\u2019s easy to argue that this is the best ever time to be an author.<\/p>\n The Big 5 firms are great. The indie publishers are better than they\u2019ve ever been. Self-publishing creates a tremendously inspiring and effective route for countless authors.<\/p>\n Author-led marketing tools are the best they\u2019ve ever been.<\/p>\n Barnes & Noble and Waterstones (respectively the flagship bookchains in the US and UK) are both in better shape than ever.<\/p>\n The independent bookstore sector has lost a lot of poor-quality stores, but the strong ones remain strong.<\/p>\n Books (thanks, especially to low cost ebook pricing) are insanely affordable \u2013 and you can read in any format you choose much more easily than before.<\/p>\n Oh yes, and Jericho Writers is here, to make your journey to publication sweeter, better informed and more companionable than it\u2019s ever been.<\/p>\n Be happy. Life is good.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" It wasn\u2019t that long ago since the largest publishers were collectively referred to as the Big 6. In 2013, however, the two largest companies in that pack merged to form Penguin Random House \u2013 a perfect example of how to merge two really strong brand-names into a nonsensical hodgepodge. The same is happening again now.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":6861,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29292],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6860","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-harrys-friday-email"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n